WE WILL WALK FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Let it be understood that if Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Mitt Romney and the Republican Party power brokers steal the Republican nomination from Donald Trump at the convention — when Trump is the clear leader — we will walk out of the Republican party and not support its nominee. Trump’s support transcends his personality and is a movement that if the Republican Party was open, would welcome and leverage to the country’s advantage, instead of impeding, obstructing and destroying. Further, we will not return to the Republican Party but will go about the task of consolidating Trump’s political gains and reform the corrupt political system that cares more about itself than the interest of the United States. Karl Rove and company, never ones to lack hubris, are very mistaken if they think that humpty dumpty (the Republican Party) can be put back together. We are prepared for the next stage of this battle, engaging our foes from George Patton’s maxim, “Never let the enemy pick the battle site.”

Sign the petition: https://www.change.org/p/chairman-reince-priebus-republican-national-committee-we-will-walk-from-the-rnc

Read and Sign Petition Below Detailing Ted Cruz’s Lack of “Natural Born Citizen” Status and Lack of Constitutional Eligibility

 

Fill out the Online Petition

Ted Cruz Eligibility Petition

A PETITION FROM THE UNDERSIGNED

[signature]

Share this with your friends:

   

 

Help Offset The Cost
Sponsored By WOBC

PayPalDonateNowSM

A PETITION FROM THE UNDERSIGNED

Recognizing that Ted Cruz is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States and is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President or VP.

Whereas, as put into the Constitution of the United States in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 by our founding fathers and framers, it requires that to be eligible for the Office of the President and Commander in Chief of our military forces, a person alive at the time of the adoption of the Constitution had a “grandfather clause” therein, and only had to be a “Citizen” of the United States, but that in the future a person born after the adoption and ratification of our U.S. Constitution they had to be more than just a “Citizen” of the United States, but must be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States;

Whereas Ted Cruz was not alive at the time of the adoption of the U.S. Constitution and cannot avail himself of the “grandfather clause” therein available to only the original “Citizens” and therefore has to meet the more restrictive “natural born Citizen” clause;

Whereas the founders and framers considered in the summer of 1787 in an early draft of the Constitution the term requiring the President to be simply only a “Citizen”, and then per Alexander Hamilton’s suggestions he proposed strengthening the requirement a bit more by requiring the person who would be a future President be “born a Citizen” for the presidential eligibility clause, the framers did not adopt either of those less restrictive citizenship terms as strong enough protection against “foreign influence”, but required instead at the written letter suggestion by John Jay (who became the 1st U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice) to George Washington that the future Presidents had to be a “natural born Citizen” to be the President and Commander in Chief as a “strong check” against “foreign influence” by birth upon a future President and Commander in Chief once the founding generation had passed;

Whereas the term “natural born Citizen”, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 is not specifically defined in the Constitution of the United States (since the Constitution does not include a glossary but was written in terms as noted in the Federalist Papers using language and terms that were clearly understood by them and the people of the USA who were called upon to adopt and ratify it), and thus we must look elsewhere outside the Constitution to what the people of founding and framing era understood said term to mean (as is mentioned in the U.S. Supreme Court Case of (1875) Minor v Happersett), in order to determine its “originalist” meaning to those that chose that term and those that voted for and adopted and ratified our U.S. Constitution;

Whereas the Laws of Nature and Natural Law as evidenced by the Preamble of our Declaration of Independence strongly influenced our revolution and break away from England and the writing of our founding documents;

Whereas, per the preeminent legal treatise much read by the founders and framers, the “Principles of Natural Law” by Emer de Vattel (1758/1775/1797) and the colonial common law familiar to the founders and framers, they and the people of the founding and framing era understood that a “natural born Citizen” was a person born in the country to parents who were BOTH Citizens (born or naturalized Citizens as long as they are both Citizens) of the country when their child was born in the country, and that term was chosen as a future national security clause as a “strong check” against “foreign influence” by or at birth on the person who would be eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of our military forces once the founding generation had passed;

Whereas that Natural Law definition provided by Vattel’s founding era legal treatise was cited in the U.S. Supreme Court “Venus” case decision of 1814 in the citizenship discussion in that case as the best on citizenship and was quoted in that case, and that a person born in the country to parents who were both citizens (born or naturalized) when their child was born in the country were the facts at birth conferring “natural born Citizenship” on a person was cited in several subsequent U.S. Supreme Court decisions including Perkins v Elg, 307, U.S. 325 (1939) when the citizenship status of a party to a case was a key matter in determining a case before that court;

Whereas Ted Cruz was clearly and admittedly NOT born in the USA but was born in Alberta, Canada as evidenced by his Canadian birth certificate and said Ted Cruz was admittedly born to a non-U.S. Citizen (Cuban Citizen) father and a U.S. Citizen mother, that said Ted Cruz was thus born with “foreign influence” upon himself via citizenship at birth in more than one country and thus he was born with multiple foreign allegiances and divided allegiances and national loyalties at and by birth, exactly what the founders and framers did NOT want for the person who would be President and Commander in Chief of our military forces in the future after the founding generation, the Original Citizens, had passed away;

Whereas Canada whiles a neighbor and friendly is a foreign country and is not part of the United States or its territorial jurisdictions;

Whereas Ted Cruz’s parents were NOT in the diplomatic service or military service of their country while they were residing and domiciled outside the United States or its territorial jurisdictions in a foreign country when their child Ted Cruz was born, and thus they are not recognized under the Principles of Natural Law and Law of Nations exceptions covering parents who are out of their country under the direction of and in the service of their country;

Whereas Congress under its powers granted to it in the U.S. Constitution in Article I can only create naturalized Citizens, either at birth or after birth subject to certain precedent and subsequent conditions outlined in said laws, and that any law or congressional act that Ted Cruz may point to past or present to try and claim eligibility, said law can only make him a “Citizen” at birth and not a “natural born Citizen” at birth. Adjectives mean something;

Therefore, be it declared by the undersigned;

That Ted Cruz is NOT a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States and is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President or Vice-President.

SIGN THE PETITION

First Name: __________________    Last Name: ________________________

City: ___________________ State: _____  ZIP: _______   Date: ___________

Are More Pages Attached With More Signatures? YES [ ]     NO [ ]

If [YES] Checked Fill In Number of Pages of Signatures Attached: [   ]

# # # #

For additional information about the history of the founders and framers selection of the term “natural born Citizen” for inclusion in the presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court legal case law re who is a “natural born Citizen”, and thus further detailing why Ted Cruz is NOT a “natural born Citizen”, read the information at the following websites: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html and https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2016/01/13/ted-cruz-is-missing-two-legs-the-three-legged-stool-test-for-natural-born-citizen/                   

cfk:12Feb2016-v10


Download a Copy and Hand Them Out and Sign and Mail Copies to Your Elected Officials and Media People Who Need to be Educated on the Truth.

pdf

  Help Offset The Cost
PayPalDonateNowSMSponsored By WOBC
570-284-7477

This article and petition is a statement of the facts, and is not meant to, or intended to, be interpreted as a political endorsement, or lack thereof, of any political candidate. WOBC takes no political point of view whatsoever.

Read and Sign Petition Below Detailing Marco Rubio’s Lack of “Natural Born Citizen” Status and Lack of Constitutional Eligibility

Marco Rubio

Cuban Citizen at Birth Marco Rubio Is NOT Constitutionally Eligible

Fill out the Online Petition

Marco Rubio Eligibility Petition

A PETITION FROM THE UNDERSIGNED

[signature]

Share this with your friends:

   

 

Help Offset The Cost
Sponsored By WOBC

PayPalDonateNowSM

A PETITION FROM THE UNDERSIGNED

Recognizing that Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States and is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President or Vice-President.

Whereas, as put into the Constitution of the United States in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 by our founding fathers and framers, it requires that to be eligible for the Office of the President and Commander in Chief of our military forces, a person alive at the time of the adoption of the Constitution had a “grandfather clause” therein, that said person only had to be a “Citizen” of the United States, but that in the future a person born after the adoption and ratification of our U.S. Constitution they had to be more than just a “Citizen” of the United States, but must be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States;

Whereas Marco Rubio was not alive at the time of the adoption of the U.S. Constitution and cannot avail himself of the “grandfather clause” therein available to only the original “Citizens” and therefore has to meet the more restrictive “natural born Citizen” clause;

Whereas the founders and framers considered in the summer of 1787 in an early draft of the Constitution the term requiring the President to be simply only a “Citizen”, and then per Alexander Hamilton’s suggestions he proposed strengthening the requirement a bit more by requiring the person who would be a future President be “born a Citizen” for the presidential eligibility clause, the framers did not adopt either of those less restrictive citizenship terms as strong enough protection against “foreign influence”, but required instead at the written letter suggestion by John Jay (who became the 1st U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice) to George Washington that the future Presidents had to be a “natural born Citizen” to be the President and Commander in Chief as a “strong check” against “foreign influence” by birth upon a future President and Commander in Chief once the founding generation had passed;

Whereas the term “natural born Citizen”, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 is not specifically defined in the Constitution of the United States (since the Constitution does not include a glossary but was written in commonly understood language of that time as was explained in the Federalist Papers using language and terms that were clearly understood by them and the people of the USA who were called upon to adopt and ratify it), and thus we must look elsewhere outside the Constitution to what the people of founding and framing era understood said “natural born Citizen” term to mean (as such direction to do so is mentioned in the U.S. Supreme Court Case of (1875) Minor v Happersett), in order to determine its “originalist” meaning to those that chose that term and those that voted for and adopted and ratified the U.S. Constitution;

Whereas the Laws of Nature and Natural Law as evidenced by the Preamble of our Declaration of Independence strongly influenced our revolution and break away from England and the writing of our founding documents;

Whereas, per the preeminent legal treatise much read by the founders and framers, the “Principles of Natural Law” by Emer de Vattel (1758/1775/1797) and the colonial common law familiar to the founders and framers, they and the people of the founding and framing era understood that a “natural born Citizen” was a person born in the country to parents who were BOTH Citizens (born or naturalized Citizens as long as they are both Citizens) of the country when their child was born in the country, and that term was chosen as a future national security clause as a “strong check” against “foreign influence” by or at birth on the person who would be eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of our military forces once the founding generation had passed;

Whereas that Natural Law definition provided by Vattel’s founding era legal treatise was cited in the U.S. Supreme Court “Venus” case decision of 1814 in the citizenship discussion in that case as the best on citizenship and was quoted in that case, and that a person born in the country to parents who were both citizens (born or naturalized) when their child was born in the country were the facts at birth conferring “natural born Citizenship” on a person was cited in several subsequent U.S. Supreme Court decisions including Perkins v Elg, 307, U.S. 325 (1939) when the citizenship status of a party to a case was a key matter in determining a case before that court;

Whereas while Marco Rubio was clearly and admittedly born in the United States, he was born to a non-U.S. Citizen (Cuban Citizen) alien father and a non-U.S. Citizen (Cuban Citizen) alien mother who were legally in the United States under work permit visas, he was thus not born a U.S. “Citizen” per Natural Law;

Whereas whiles Cuba is a neighboring country and diplomatic relationships are currently being restored with it, Cuba has in the past been a very hostile neighbor, Cuba is a foreign country and is not part of the United States or its territorial jurisdictions;

Whereas because Marco Rubio was born in the United States to non-U.S. Citizen Cuban parents, that said Marco Rubio was thus born with dual-Citizenship, i.e., a “Citizen” of the United States due to his place of birth in the USA under generally interpreted jus soli rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court re the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, he was also born with “Cuban Citizenship at Birth”, which he inherited from his Cuban father and mother via jus sanguinis Laws of Nature and the Constitution and Laws of Cuba;

Whereas Marco Rubio was born a Citizen of two sovereign countries and thus has birth allegiance to two countries at birth, he was thus born with “foreign influence” upon himself via citizenship at birth of more than one country and thus he was born with dual foreign allegiances, and has divided allegiances and national loyalties at and by birth, exactly what the founders and framers did NOT want for the person who would be President and Commander in Chief of our military forces in the future after the founding generation, the original “Citizens”, had passed away;

Whereas even though under the Wong King Ark (1898) ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution Marco Rubio is generally considered by the general public to be a 14th Amendment “born Citizen” of the United States, because he was born in the United States to alien parents who were Cuban Citizens legally in the United States under work permit visas, Marco Rubio is definitely NOT a constitutional Article II Section 1 Clause 5 “natural born Citizen” of the United States;

Whereas Congress under its powers granted to it in the U.S. Constitution in Article I and the U.S. Supreme Court in the powers granted to it in the U.S. Constitution in Article III can only make persons “Citizens” by their acts and rulings, either by the person’s place and status at birth or after birth, subject to certain precedent and subsequent conditions and actions required that may exist and are outlined in said laws and court rulings, and that any law or congressional act or constitutional amendment in effect at this time, which Marco Rubio may point to (past or present) to try and claim eligibility, that said law, court ruling, or constitutional amendment, can only make him a “Citizen” of the United States at birth and not a constitutional Article II “natural born Citizen” of the United States at birth. Adjectives mean something;

Therefore, be it declared by the undersigned;

That Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States and is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President or Vice-President.

SIGN THE PETITION

First Name: __________________    Last Name: ________________________

City: ___________________ State: _____  ZIP: _______   Date: ___________

Are More Pages Attached With More Signatures? YES [ ]     NO [ ]

If [YES] Checked Fill In Number of Pages of Signatures Attached: [   ]

# # # #

For additional information about the history of the founders and framers selection of the term “natural born Citizen” for inclusion in the presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court legal case law re who is a “natural born Citizen”, and thus further detailing why Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen”, read the information at the following websites: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html and https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2011/05/27/senator-marco-rubios-lack-of-natural-born-citizenship-update-27-may-2011-see-pdf-copy-of-the-sep-1975-petition-for-naturalization-for-mario-rubio-father-of-senator-marco-rubio-who-was-born-in-may/                                         

cfk:12Feb2016-Ver-8


Download a Copy and Hand Them Out and Sign and Mail Copies to Your Elected Officials and Media People Who Need to be Educated on the Truth.

pdf

Help Offset The Cost

PayPalDonateNowSMSponsored By WOBC
570-284-7477

This article and petition is a statement of the facts, and is not meant to, or intended to, be interpreted as a political endorsement, or lack thereof, of any political candidate. WOBC takes no political point of view whatsoever.

Jeff Crouere From Ringside Politics WGSO Will Interview J.B. Williams From The North American Law Center On An Update On Articles Of Impeachment Against Obama.

Announcement:

On Thursday, December 10, J.B. Williams will join Jeff Crouere, host of
Ringside Politics on WGSO, New Orleans to discuss the North American Law
Center’s Articles of Impeachment against the current occupant of the
White House. The show will air at 9 a.m. CST, 10 a.m. EST, and people
can listen live at www.WGSO.com <http://www.WGSO.com> or via the Tune-in
mobile app. Please spread the word!

articles of impeachment cd

north american law center

ringside-300x300banner

dollar-bill1-150x150

Posted By Mike: admin
570-284-7477

Choosing National Suicide, By Larry Sellin


As Winston Churchill noted in his indictment of appeasement of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, “there is a great danger in refusing to believe things you do not like.”

Barack Hussein Obama is succeeding in his fundamental transformation; that is, dismantling the United States as a capitalist republic, based on Judeo-Christian democratic principles.

Obama is dangerous as a President because his ideologies, Marxism and sympathy for Islam, drive him to pursue policies that run counter to the national interest, the well-being of the American people and, quite frankly, the survival of the country. His mendacity is compounded by his arrogance and narcissism that prevent him from accepting responsibility and learning from his mistakes. He is not on our side.

People ask – How can this be happening to our country? What can we do to stop it?

It can happen because the political-media establishment does not consider the United States “our” country. The political-media establishment considers the United States “their” country, in which ordinary Americans are permitted to live as long as we elect those they want elected and continue to pay taxes to support their lavish life styles and to maintain the corrupt status quo. Welcome to feudal America.

It can happen because, like Obama, the Democrat Party, the liberal media and academia are populated with the same Islamo-Marxists, a totalitarian marriage of convenience, distinguished by the traits they share – their hatred of Western civilization and a belief that the United States is the embodiment of evil on earth. While Islamic radicals seek to purge the world of heresies and of the infidels who practice them, leftist radicals seek to purge society of the vices allegedly spawned by capitalism — those being racism, sexism, imperialism, and greed. Through unregulated immigration, Democrats seek to alter the demographics of the United States to create a permanent one-party state to implement their far-left totalitarian agenda. Islamists have something similar in mind, albeit even more brutal and oppressive.

It can happen because America’s domestic enemies promulgate notions that attack the basis of Western Judeo-Christian civilization, which emphasizes the uniqueness and sacredness of the individual. They also promote policies that weaken our ability to transmit to the next generation the values and traditions upon which the United States was built e.g. the Common Core assault on American education. Anti-American, messianic political movements can only succeed when the individual believes that his or her actions are determined, not by personal freedom endowed by the Creator, but by the destiny of the community, endowed by a ruling elite of commissars or mullahs.

In can happen in any otherwise sophisticated society that loses a sense of its own history, succumbs to a present-tense culture and embraces the false promises of a leftist utopia in order to generate the truly blissed-out and vacant servitude required by the Obama strategy. Using media deception and historical revisionism, the low-information voter will slouch towards Obama’s utopia by a combination of governmental coercion as in George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four” and the hedonist nihilism of a painless, amusement-sodden, and stress-free consensus managed by the nanny-state found in Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.

It can happen because the Republican establishment and its propaganda arm, Fox News, choose not to expose and oppose Obama to any extent that it might place in jeopardy their position as junior partners in the corrupt political-media status quo. They are funded by and serve the Chamber of Commerce and a broader class of wealthy global financiers, locusts, who view America as just another landmass and people to exploit.  Republicans are not in Congress to represent their constituency or solve the nation’s problems, but to perpetuate themselves in office. As the Republican establishment’s grip on power becomes ever more tenuous, they will more aggressively oppose internal political challenges, whether it is from Donald Trump or the Tea Party and they more eagerly work together with Obama and the Democrats.

Case in point is the cynical piece of legislative window dressing, but appropriately-named  SAFE ACT (American Security Against Foreign Enemies), recently passed by a bipartisan “veto-proof” 289-137 majority in the Paul Ryan (R-WI)-led House of Representatives. It is being heralded by the political-media establishment as a bill that would “erect high hurdles for Syrian and Iraqi refugees coming to American shores” and “require new FBI background checks and individual sign-offs from three high-ranking U.S. officials before any refugee could come to the U.S. from Iraq or Syria.” Those descriptions are nonsensical at best, outright lies at worst. FBI Director James Comey already testified before the House Committee on Homeland Security that the federal government does not have the ability to conduct thorough background checks for terrorist ties on all Syrian refugees. The legislation does not cover potential terrorists coming from countries other than Iraq and Syria. Finally, the SAFE ACT gives final approval authority for entry solely to the Obama Administration, which has vowed to flood the country with refugees i.e. to facilitate a Muslim invasion of the U.S. similar to that we are witnessing in Europe, all financed by George Soros. The SAFE ACT does not provide physical safety for the American people, but it does provide political safety for the Republican establishment in the form of disinformation and legislative legerdemain.

In essence, the Republican establishment, in choosing to collaborate with Obama and the Democrats, is choosing national suicide. They prefer that option to representative government.

What can we do to stop it?

More than anything else, the political-media establishment does not want the American people to take back our country. The legislation, executive orders and judicial decisions emanating from Washington D.C. are geared to maintain the status quo or enhance the power of the federal government over the American people.

More than any other time in our history has the separation between the rulers and the ruled been as great and it bears comparison to the events leading up to the American Revolution. Whenever the interests of government officials are in such stark conflict with those of the people, tyranny ensues.

Frederick Douglass wrote: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”

I think the American people are running out of words.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of “Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution “. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

Mike Volin 570-284-7477

Media Flee’s Nuclear Fallout!, Sheriff Joe Arpaio Leaks Secret Audio

imgresThe major media news outlets have been foaming at the bit over charges that the Arpaio Sheriff’s department was doing its job against the open border policy of the Obama administration.

The unexpected testimony from an informant included stolen bank account numbers with passwords, the names of Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, FOX News Carl Cameron, CIA Director John Brennan and more.

The informant declared that the CIA Director ordered some work from a hacker in effort to obtain information on certain folks. This is what tyrants use to silence critics and gain favor. Another word would be extortion and or blackmail. Listen below.

All audio clips can be heard here; https://soundcloud.com/stephenlemons

The media and liberal pundits around the Phoenix area were certain Arpaio was on the ropes for really just doing his job when Judge Snow demanded some answers. Little did Snow realize that the Sheriff’s department had information that gave the Sheriff’s department reason to believe Judge Snow was being spied upon as well by government agencies.

The Sheriff’s office was trying to keep a lid on the informant information as their investigation ensued however the nature and tone of the questions by prosecutors left the Arpaio team no choice but to divulge some information.

Not all of this secret informant information has been released according to Mike Zullo lead investigator for the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

More can be read here, http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/11/18/wobc-to-host-radio-show-on-arpaio-confidential-informant-tapes/

Mike Volin 570-284-7477

Articles of Impeachment Radio Show

images

JB Williams with the North American Law Center recently spent 2 hours on air with Brian and Randy on the patriotvoice.net. I have included all 4 segments of the podcast below however, if you are pressed for time select the third audio podcast for the meat of the impeachment process and details of the North American Law Center authored articles. Great listening.

You may have to copy and paste these links into your browser.
Go to the bottom of wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com and scroll to the bottom of the page for links to the North American Law Center and to download your copy of the articles of impeachment.
You may also download a copy of the Sheriff’s Kit that contains evidence that pertains to Article One of the Articles of Impeachment. The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has indicated they will cooperate with the Judiciary Committee for the identity theft and identity fraud charges that are spelled out in Article One of the Articles. imgres
There are many congressman who have been outspoken about impeaching this rogue administration so we know the appetite is there. Americans and Overpasses for America has been very public about the American desire to impeach this impostor in the White House that we know has at least three aliases and presented over 20 social security numbers.
Bill OReilly of FOX News has been adamant that he’s solved the single social security number Obama uses saying his daddy must have got it for him. Well Bill, if that is true he gave his son a fraudulent social security number. Researchers believe one of Obama’s socials  belonged to a Mr. Harrison Bounel….who has been dead for some time. But according to skip tracer Al Hendershot data systems available only to licensed individuals and Law Enforcement Agencies,  Mr. Bounel although dead, was shown as living at the Chicago home address of Mr. Barack Obama AKA, Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama.
In addition, Linda Jordan ran an E’Verify Check on Mr. Obama, Soetoro’s social security number from an unmasked tax return and the check came back “failed” and suggested number indicated fraud.
So far congress has been silent on the criminal activity of Mr. Obama if that is his real name to the ire and irritation of citizens at large for good reason. Identity theft is a felony as is uploading fraudulent documents to government servers.

Impeachment Call To Action Broadcast On WOBC Radio Monday Night 10-26-15

JB Williams and Karen Bracken will provide us with an update on the impeachment program just off the heels of Stephen Pidgeon and his Impeachment report on One America News Network.

Wikipedia–“During the Obama presidency, republican congressmembers have stated that Obama may have engaged in impeachable activity and may face removal from office. Rationales offered for impeachment have included an alleged White House cover-up after the 2012 Benghazi related American deaths.

In May 2010, Republican Issa of Calif. said the allegation the White House had offered Pennsylvania Representative Joe Sestak a job to persuade Sestak to drop out of the Penn. senate election against Arlen Spector “is one that everyone from Arlen Spector to Dick Morris has said is in fact a crime, and could be impeachable”. With the possibility of becoming chairman of the Oversight and reform committee in January 2011, Issa said in October 2010 that the committee would not seek to impeach Obama.

In August 2011, Republican Congressman Michael Burgess of Texas stated that the impeachment of Barack Obama “needs to happen” in order to prevent Obama from “pushing his agenda”. Burgess did not mention any grounds for impeachment. In June 2012, Senator Joe Kyl said on the Bill Bennett radio show that “impeachment is always a possibility” when discussing the Obama policy on immigration

May 2013: James Inhofe, Benghazi attack reason for impeachment.

Blake Farenthold said at a town hall said Obama should be impeached on birth certificate issues.

Kerry Bentivolio would like to write articles of impeachment, a dream come true”

This broadcast will be live. Open phone lines.

Call in number to get on the air: 347-989-8853 (press 1)dollar-bill1-150x150

Posted By Mike Admin
http://wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com
570-284-7477

The Betrayal Papers

Betrayal Papers: Part I – Under Obama The US Captured by the Muslim Brotherhood

Betrayal Papers: Part II – In Plain Sight – A National Security “Smoking Gun”

Betrayal Papers: Part III – Obama’s Scandals and Assaults on Freedoms Explained

Betrayal Papers: Part IV – A New Genocide

Betrayal Papers: Part V – Who is Barack Hussein Obama?

Betrayal Papers: Part VI – The Chicago Connection

Malik Obama Interviewed by Director Joel Gilbert

Malik Obama Interviewed by Director Joel Gilbert (Dreams from My Real Father)

  In this “tell all” interview with Director Joel Gilbert, Malik Obama, the “half-brother” of President Obama, reveals his pain and confusion over Barack’s shunning of his Kenyan family after becoming President. Malik provides a stunning take on the film, Dreams from My Real Father, stating “Frank Marshall Davis and Barack look alike” and adds that Barack does not look like his father. Malik says he would like a DNA test so the truth can come come out. Malik also states that Barack is “deceptive” and “has not been an honest man.” In the interview, Malik displays an early manuscript he helped edit of Barack’s book Dreams from My Father with a different title. Malik Obama, also known as Abon’go (Roy) Obama, was born in 1958. He is the first child from the marriage of Barack Hussein Obama and Kezia Obama. Malik and Barack first met in 1985 when Barack flew from Chicago to Washington DC to visit Malik. Malik later hosted Barack in Kenya and they served as the best men at each other’s weddings. Barack wrote of his lifelong relationship with Malik (Roy) in Dreams from My Father.

Joel Gilbert Filmmaker Discuss His Recent Interview With Malik Obama on WOBC’s BlogTalkRadio Program.
BlogTalkRadioPlay

You be the Judge, Who looks like Obama’s Father?obamasdaddy