Obama Assumption Or Presumption

Mr.Glenn Beck
Fox Network
New York,New York

Dear Glenn,
On Jan.4, I viewed your five pm show on Fox and was impressed by your impassioned manner and command of facts on the issues. For that, I admire you. Please keep up the good work. Sadly, however, on your radio show that same day you castigated those questioning whether Barack Obama was a Constitutionally elected President. I would like to respond to your assumptions of that day and pray that my words will help change your outlook on this issue and induce you to so notify your radio and tv audiences.

ASSUMPTION OR PRESUMPTION

Assumption: You said:” …there is a concerted effort on all radio stations to get birthers on the air”
Response: For a long time stations refused to allow Constitution defenders, including “birthers” (and “Beck-ers” I might add) to air their grievances and questions. You now enjoy that privilege….why can’t others?

Assumption: You claimed “birthers” and, by extension, all Constitutional defenders”may believe Obama brainwashed Hillary Clinton into not exposing his fraud”.
Response: Obama simply had his Hawaiian birth certificate copy locked away from view, thus making it inaccessable to all, including Mrs. Clinton.

Assumption: “Birthers” (there’s that word again) ‘believe Obama’s KGB Control may have put his birth announcement in 1961 Hawaiian newspapers with a roadmap of getting an African man into office.”
Response: Let’s be serious, Glenn. Hawaiian birth announcements, whether of “naturalized” or “natural-born” status, were automatically sent to newspapers by the Hawaiian Dept.of Health. A “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB), which Obama displayed on a website to justify his Presidential eligibility, if legitimate, confers “naturalized” citizenship status. It does, however, have one serious limitation. Only a “Certificate of Live Birth” may qualify one for “natural-born” status, the only status permitted for one seeking the Presidency of the United States. (U.S.Constitution-Article 2, Section 1) Therefore, unless the Hawaiian vault copy is a “Certificate of Live Birth”, Obama, a Constitutional scholar, was ineligible to seek the Presidency….and knew it!
With his continued refusal (to the tune of 2-4 Million Dollars in personal legal fees) to permit disclosure of the Vault Birth Certificate copy to anyone, including Military members who risked their careers for this disclosure, what does that tell us?

Assumption: You defended Obama’s refusal to produce the Hawaiian vault birth certificate with “why do that when these people (birthers) are so discrediting themselves?”
Response: That was a non-answer Glenn, since producing it might have avoided about 75-100 lawsuits which, not incidentally, the Major Media has quietly kept hidden from the Public. Was this the “Freedom of the Press” which our Country’s founders fought for?

Assumption: You referred to the actions of those questioning Obama’s eligibility as “Dumb”.
Response: We are speaking about Presidential eligibility, an issue which our beleagured Founders felt important enough to become the second article in our Constitution-not a footnote or suggestion. How dumb is it to insist that Obama resolve this issue by authorizing release of the vault certificate, as well as other relevant documents(1981 Passport to Pakistan, College records, etc). The actions which you decry are simply demands for ‘TRANSPARENCY”-a term Obama often uses….yet more often abuses. Are people like Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs,etc. and all the Plaintiffs in the legal challenges (including one hundred servicemen and women, ranging from NCO’s to Generals who receive my e-mails) considered dumb for seeking the truth?. You yourself repeatedly exhort your audiences to QUESTION!,QUESTION!,QUESTION!

Assumption: “Why don’t we go after the things provable, go after the things that actually you need to stop right now?”
Response: Stopping things which can be proven unconstitutional is praiseworthy and I applaud you for your efforts. Stopping persons, however, who may be proven unconstitutionaly elected, could stop and possibly reverse those same actions which you, I and millions of others rightfully abhor.

POINTS TO PONDER

Though simply a layman, I have spent one and one-half years studying articles, e-mails,etc. on this issue and would like to emphasize some points which I believe must be addressed by Obama to confirm or deny his eligibility:
1.Obama has never, I repeat, never been “vetted”. Remember, the birth certificate which he put on a website was not a Certificate of Live Birth and was obviously a deliberate deception on his part since he knew it would not justify his eligibility.
2.The passport used by him to enter war-ridden Pakistan in 1981 was not a U.S.passport since U.S. passports were not issued in 1981 to regular American citizens. Also, his school and medical records,etc.were all blocked from public access by him.
3. Who would spend $2-4 million dollars in legal fees rather than simply produce a legitimate Certificate of Live Birth when seeking the office of President, unless the Certificate would confirm his ineligibility?
4,Three million members in the Armed Forces yet only one, I repeat, one, has refused to let anyone see his birth certificate….The Commander-in-Chief….Barack Obama! THIS STATEMENT, ALONE, SCREAMS FOR JUSTIFICATION. Going further, every Serviceman or woman who challenged Obama’s eligibility in court was abandoned by their supposed leader. His attorneys have blocked every attempt to force disclosure of any records, birth or otherwise!. How’s that for transparency and, more importantly, for concern of our Military?
5. Bill O’Reilly of Fox claimed on TV that Fox could have very easily obtained a copy of Obama’s valid birth certificate from Hawaii. This was a serious falsehood since no one has ever been given permission to view it-and many have requested it. I presume that Mr.O’Reilly was either misinformed or uninformed by Fox. So much for “fair and balanced” reporting on this issue. Incidentally, why didn’t he request a copy?

Glenn, you have just read the words of one of the millions you obviously consider “dumb” about this issue. I trust that you will now view us in a better light. There is an old saying: “Where there is smoke there’s fire.” Has Obama started a conflagration in an attempt to smother the truth by any possible means? He may deny it but his actions are speaking louder than his words. To quote Bill O’Reilly “What say you?”

With Kindest Regards
A faithful Viewer

Posted By: Robert Quinn
Staff Writer

One thought on “Obama Assumption Or Presumption

  1. Pakistan accepted ordinary US passports in 1981.

    Obama has shown both the short-form certification of live birth (which is the only birth certificate that ROMNEY has shown) and the long-form certificate of live birth. He has shown both the actual physical copies of the birth certificates, with the seal on the back, and images on the Web. Romney has only shown a photocopy of his short-form birth certificate, without letting a reporter see the seal (or the signature of the doctor, which would be on the long-form).

    The fact that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate and that the facts on the birth certificate that Obama are exactly the same as on the document in the files has been repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii (of both parties) and by the Index Data:

    http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04/in_hawaii_its_easy_to_get_birt.html

    And by the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the Hawaii newspapers, which as the name says, were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and only for births in Hawaii.

    Oh, and there is this:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiolani-confirms/

    (Hardly great evidence, but it is interesting that birther web sites have hidden that interview)

    Dr Conspiracy lists the following points:

    1. Barack Obama released his official Hawaiian birth certificate on June 12, 2008.
    2. Obama’s parents lived in Hawaii (a short trip to Kapi’olani Hospital) and most of the time children are born where their parents live.
    3. The Immigration files of Barack Obama Sr. categorically state that he did not leave the country in 1961.
    4. The INS statistical report for July 1, 1961 – June 30 states that NO American citizens traveled to the US by air on a trip starting in Kenya that whole year! [An in fact only 21 people total came using sea and air, only 21]
    5. Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Republican, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health personally inspected Obama’s original birth certificate in the files in Hawaii and said it was there and Obama was born in Hawaii. Her statement is on the State web site, and she was interviewed on CNN confirming.
    6. Dr. Alvin Onaka, Chief of Vital Records, has sent a signed and sealed verification of Obama’s birth in Hawaii to the Secretary of State of Arizona, and it now resides on the Arizona State web site.
    7. Dr. Onaka has sent a signed and sealed verification filed with the Federal Court in Mississippi stating that he examined the long form PDF file on the White House web site and that it matches the original in the Department files in every respect.
    8. Dr. Loretta Fuddy, Democrat, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, has stated on the Department web site that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is in the files, that she has personally inspected it, and that a copy was provided to the President (a couple of days before the White House released it).
    9. The Long Form birth certificate original certified copy was presented to the Press at the White House news conference, and one correspondent, Savannah Guthrie, snapped a photo of it and stated that she “felt the raised seal.” It is irresponsible to say that the long form hasn’t been released.
    10. An August 1961 hand-written memo from William Wood II in the State Department files for Obama Sr. state that Barack Obama II was born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu.
    11. Obama’s birth was reported in 1961 in two competing Honolulu newspapers, from a list provided by the Health Department. A long-time reporter interviewed by CNN stated that parents could not submit names to these columns. Obama’s name appears in the same order in both papers, proving that they came from the same list.
    12. A trip to Africa would have been prohibitively expensive in 1961, and would have been extremely arduous (3 days) for a pregnant woman.
    13. Barbara Nelson recalls a conversation with Dr. West who practiced at Kapi’olani who told her that “Stanley had a baby.”
    14. Jon Chessoni, first Secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, DC, said, speaking of inquiries the Embassy received about President Obama being born in Kenya: “When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.”
    15. Hawaiian Law in 1961 did not allow issuance of a birth certificate except for persons born in Hawaii.
    16. Barack Obama appears in the 1961 bound birth index available for inspection at the Department of Health in Hawaii. (Several videos, including one from CNN confirm).

Leave a Reply